Iain Provan, V. Philips Long, and Tremper Longman: The Cuttlefish of Old Testament studies

Provan, Long, and Longman: The Cuttlefish of Old Testament studies

Provan, Long, and Longman: The Cuttlefish of Old Testament studies

Recently, Christopher Heard provided a short review of A Biblical History of Israel by Iain Provan, V. Philips Long, and Tremper Longman. He astutely observes that the longest sections in the book coincide with topics for which there is either little or no historical evidence. Or, as Christopher nicely puts it:

What is bizarre about the book is that the amount of attention given to the value of any text for historical reconstruction tends to run inversely proportional to the amount of external data available that could be used to verify or falsify the historicity of the biblical storyline. That is, Provan, Long, and Longman spend almost 100 pages on the “historicity” of the patriarchs, exodus, conquest, and “period of the judges,” even going so far as to try to reconstruct a chronology from the books of Joshua and Judges that would comport with the figure of 480 years from the exodus to the temple building per 1 Kings 6:1. Saul, David, and Solomon get another 70 pages or so, combined. The Omrides—the first group of Israelite kings for whom we have direct epigraphic attestation—get just under four pages.

- Christopher Heard, A Biblical History of Israel: Half a book”, 23 March 2006

In other words, Provan, Long, and Longman are the cuttlefish of Old Testament studies. For when biblical apologists such as these are confronted with a text which has little or no historicity, their response is, much like a frightened cuttlefish, to squirt as much ink as possible in order to cloud the waters.

Sort of like normal operating procedures in theology, I guess.

About these ads

8 Comments

Filed under Ancient Jewish texts

8 responses to “Iain Provan, V. Philips Long, and Tremper Longman: The Cuttlefish of Old Testament studies

  1. ‘For when biblical apologists such as these are confronted with a text which has little or no historicity, their response is, much like a frightened cuttlefish, to squirt as much ink as possible in order to cloud the waters’

    That is the BEST metaphor ever!!!!

  2. Jim

    in what universe is 2006 ‘recently’?

    • Tyrone Slothrop

      In God’s universe Jim – for as it is written, one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day (2 Peter 3:8; KJV).

  3. dcm

    I think Provan, Long and Longman rock! I hope they keep writing!!

  4. I’m writing my own chapter-by-chapter review of Provan, Long, and Longman’s book at my blog-here’s part one:
    http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/2013/02/09/biblical-history-of-israel-chapter-1/
    and here’s part two:
    http://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/review-of-a-biblical-history-of-israel-chapter-2/
    Also, your link to Heard’s review is broken. It should be http://web.archive.org/web/20111128214723/http://drchris.me/higgaion/?p=323

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s